Gladys’ travails

[Greynomad]

So, Gladys Beg-your-pardon had a “close personal relationship” with a fellow MP who is now in deep doo-doos.
Does “close personal relationship” mean they were doing what married couples do?





Like arguing about who puts the bins out this week?

[Noggins]

So, Gladys Beg-your-pardon had a “close personal relationship” with a fellow MP who is now in deep doo-doos.
Does “close personal relationship” mean they were doing what married couples do?





Like arguing about who puts the bins out this week?

I suppose it's more like "who wears the bag this time" ( as in "I can't see you'' )
My comment on a certain page was ;-
While she's getting bonked she's also bonking the electorate.
Pass it on political style.


r

[Keith Morris]

"tanks" here---She forgot to say "I can't recall" .
She could take a few lessons from the Victoria mob.
Keith

[Shirley]

Only having a little fun, she has dedicated her life to politics.

[RobertNotBob]

And doing it with a married man, no example being set here.

[native pepper]

Who cares, as long as there was nothing corrupt about their association, it's none of anyone's business. We are all human and have human desires, love and lust tend to have weird effects on people and she has the right to affection and love. As for him being married, nothing new in that, lots of people of both sexes cheat for various reasons.

Seems nothing has changed over the centuries, we still get the holier than thou hypocrites making out they are above reproach, when if you looked at their lives, they probably have lots to hide.

[Macca]

Nothing to do with we mortals anyway.

[Dot]

Really don't care what she does with her private life as long as it doesn't effect the public. If it was the ginger ninja nothing would be done or said. Like the woman that was asked about Tr--ps recording about grabbing her pussy cat, the woman replied "It was a private conversation"

[Greynomad]

"It was a private conversation"

I think she was misquoted.
What she probably said was "It was a privates conversation."



BTW, some of the released transcripts indicate that she deliberately did not want him to detail some of his real estate dabblings...
ie. "I don't need to know that." was one quote I heard.
It's called "Plausible deniability". Nixon was a past master at it.

[T1 Terry]

Who cares, as long as there was nothing corrupt about their association, it's none of anyone's business. We are all human and have human desires, love and lust tend to have weird effects on people and she has the right to affection and love. As for him being married, nothing new in that, lots of people of both sexes cheat for various reasons.

Seems nothing has changed over the centuries, we still get the holier than thou hypocrites making out they are above reproach, when if you looked at their lives, they probably have lots to hide.

Uuummmmm, he was not only doing corrupt under the table deals, he was using his political office as a base to do the deals ..... Did Gladys use her position to get him into a position of sufficient power to be able to do such deals ????
Daryl Maguire, the bloke who was being investigated by the ICAC about corrupt dealings that tied Gladys into the whole mess, today told the enquiry that he had discussed property deals with Gladys during their relationship .... someone is telling porky pies and I can't see making such a claim would help Daryl at all in how they will treat his offences .....

T1 Terry